Glen,
You are a true hearts player.
Roady
Search found 5 matches
- Apr 03, 2014
- Forum: GrassGames' Hearts
- Topic: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 248861
- Apr 03, 2014
- Forum: GrassGames' Hearts
- Topic: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 248861
Re: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
Please consider the following idea for a points system. Assume, at the end of a game, four players have the following scores: player no. 4 loses at 100 points, player no. 3 accumulates 75 points, player no. 2 accumulates 50 points, and the winner accumulates 25 points. Each of the three losers pay t...
- Mar 24, 2014
- Forum: GrassGames' Hearts
- Topic: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 248861
Re: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
I am not suggesting that GrassGames create a play-for-money system, only the establishment of a ranking model that considers honest play by using the money game as a basis for creating structure.
Roady Harte
Roady Harte
- Mar 24, 2014
- Forum: GrassGames' Hearts
- Topic: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 248861
Re: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
On reflection, I want to chip in once more. Studiodcom made a great point. In the game of cutthroat with which I am familiar, the play lasts for hours - sometimes all night - like poker. Players do not quit after a thumping, nor after winning big. So my question: Could GrassGames consider a point sy...
- Mar 23, 2014
- Forum: GrassGames' Hearts
- Topic: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 248861
Re: 2.6 - Rankings or No Rankings?
In response to PS GOPHERLO: I've played Hearts for money for years and cutthroat has never been a derogatory term. It has always been the description of a game where people play without partners...a good game...just like the GrassGames...which I enjoy immensely. I might also point out that no one qu...