King 101 here. I won two games today on network games. (today is 1/26/2018). I received 1 point for each win which now puts me at 2983. I lost 300 points when I was overseas for 3 months.
Can you explain the points system. ?? I understood that you received 1 pt just for playing, but 1 point for winning??
This is only important because it does mean something to other players and tough to get a game when they look at you score (I don't want to play with a rookie??). In any case, my email address is DrRtc@gmail.com .
I am only to glad to hear from you or anyone that has this problem with the points. I have won 23.8% of games played and less than 12% of time come in 4th.
Points for winning
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Nov 17, 2013
Re: Points for winning
Try this link. http://www.grassgames.com/network/calc/index.html
It should demonstrate how the weighting system works. Regards. Ice
It should demonstrate how the weighting system works. Regards. Ice
Re: Points for winning
http://www.grassgames.com/network/calc/index.html
Thanks for the hyperlink. I think I know how the system is supposed to work, and I am saying that it has the unintended consequence of supporting a broken system, very much like socialism, the elite and those at the bottom. The elite cannot interact since they will be punished and end up on the bottom. The bottom is forever doomed to be on the bottom.
If you grade on win, lose --it is a coin. toss and you still have the problem. However, if it is weighed exactly the same, the problem has a tendency to become smaller. Today I played, came in second to someone (good player) and lost. He is 10 points lower (or was), since I lost 10 points at second place.
We can weigh and rejuggle the scores now. But when people are entrenched at 4000, they don't even want a game. Time for the Molotov cocktails and re do and refresh just as if you were playing a temporal game. The score is what it is, declare a winner now, start again.
Have a system in place for those that travel 6 months and can't play. They can still keep their score or lose just a tiny bit, but not hundreds of points. Try getting wifi in Chad. King 101
Thanks for the hyperlink. I think I know how the system is supposed to work, and I am saying that it has the unintended consequence of supporting a broken system, very much like socialism, the elite and those at the bottom. The elite cannot interact since they will be punished and end up on the bottom. The bottom is forever doomed to be on the bottom.
If you grade on win, lose --it is a coin. toss and you still have the problem. However, if it is weighed exactly the same, the problem has a tendency to become smaller. Today I played, came in second to someone (good player) and lost. He is 10 points lower (or was), since I lost 10 points at second place.
We can weigh and rejuggle the scores now. But when people are entrenched at 4000, they don't even want a game. Time for the Molotov cocktails and re do and refresh just as if you were playing a temporal game. The score is what it is, declare a winner now, start again.
Have a system in place for those that travel 6 months and can't play. They can still keep their score or lose just a tiny bit, but not hundreds of points. Try getting wifi in Chad. King 101
Return to “GrassGames' Hearts”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests