A = Autoplay
Re: A = Autoplay
I was responding to your earlier post, sorry. I've no idea about the Intelligence scores - maybe others have input.
Aidan
GrassGames.com
GrassGames.com
Re: A = Autoplay
Aidan,
I think Ice is suggesting that the Autoplay code sequence can be split out of the “ AutoPlay included” games and inserted into another game where it is not included, or placing a “CALL” to the AUTOPLAY code with a “true” / false” HACK, thus allowing the “ claimed” impossible scores.
Ice
Having checked out GAPS, in the Quick mode, and in the three leaderboard period listings, it is fairly clear to me that the “ time spread “ of the 20 leaders when considered together with the different devices used, as well as the frequent changes between the leaders’ names, that the scores achieved are due to skills accrued by the players once they have identified the best starter placements and then the playing sequence necessary to achieve the desired outcome.
These skills are achievable by honing the necessary memory, sight and suit matching skills over a reasonable playing period.
Additionally the AUTOPLAY sequence as set up in “Intelligence” would not fit the requirements of GAPS, as GAPS’ required card play and finish are completely different.
My opinion “ achieved skills, definitely not hacking!”
tmno2
Terry
I think Ice is suggesting that the Autoplay code sequence can be split out of the “ AutoPlay included” games and inserted into another game where it is not included, or placing a “CALL” to the AUTOPLAY code with a “true” / false” HACK, thus allowing the “ claimed” impossible scores.
Ice
Having checked out GAPS, in the Quick mode, and in the three leaderboard period listings, it is fairly clear to me that the “ time spread “ of the 20 leaders when considered together with the different devices used, as well as the frequent changes between the leaders’ names, that the scores achieved are due to skills accrued by the players once they have identified the best starter placements and then the playing sequence necessary to achieve the desired outcome.
These skills are achievable by honing the necessary memory, sight and suit matching skills over a reasonable playing period.
Additionally the AUTOPLAY sequence as set up in “Intelligence” would not fit the requirements of GAPS, as GAPS’ required card play and finish are completely different.
My opinion “ achieved skills, definitely not hacking!”
tmno2
Terry
-
SunnyCorner
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Nov 17, 2013
Re: A = Autoplay
Thanks Terry - that was exactly what I was suggesting. Its also clear to me now that the free game(s) have different players in them. However, there is one guy playing the free version of GAPS who is routinely scoring sub 1:20 seconds and occupied the top 1/2/3/4/5 position on the leaderboard every week. I can't remember his name and I can't now check as the free version is deleted - I just don't believe its possible to move the cards as quick as that.
Regards. Ice
Regards. Ice
Re: A = Autoplay
Ice
Hi again
Remember with cards there is also a major effect on the outcome of your play called “LUCK”. It starts with the “deal” and continues with the choice of each of the cards you play next.
This is the reason casinos have a greater winning percentage than any average punter, and more so with a consistent punter.
A jackpot may fall to you by chance, but keep playing, and “it” will be lost together with everything else you own.
At this time the current overall leader in GAPS is Chris, a Canadian with a winning time of “1:09.5”. So I reckon he must have had a good deal, plus lots of luck, plus a fair bit of skill.
Chris appears only once in each of the time classes of the leaderboard, so either, he is or must be a very lucky beginner perhaps even with a few mathematical skills as well. I wonder how many times he had to play the tutorial “assisted” game to achieve that on his first try. At least he would have had a week to practice, perhaps even a month, but “ WOW”, that will take some beating.
Gives you something to aim for, hey?
Congratulations CHRIS, should buy a lottery ticket while you’re at it.
tmno2
Terry
Edited: 19/08/19 , 17:45 AEST.
Correction to above, “Chris” is mentioned in GAPS “year” scores on January 11th, with a time of 1:27.7, so he did have some reasonable playing experience under his belt, when achieving the outstanding score identified above.
So practice plus luck has won out, leading to support my opinion that a “hack” is a most unlikely way to achieve glory in this game.
tmno2
Terry
Hi again
Remember with cards there is also a major effect on the outcome of your play called “LUCK”. It starts with the “deal” and continues with the choice of each of the cards you play next.
This is the reason casinos have a greater winning percentage than any average punter, and more so with a consistent punter.
A jackpot may fall to you by chance, but keep playing, and “it” will be lost together with everything else you own.
At this time the current overall leader in GAPS is Chris, a Canadian with a winning time of “1:09.5”. So I reckon he must have had a good deal, plus lots of luck, plus a fair bit of skill.
Chris appears only once in each of the time classes of the leaderboard, so either, he is or must be a very lucky beginner perhaps even with a few mathematical skills as well. I wonder how many times he had to play the tutorial “assisted” game to achieve that on his first try. At least he would have had a week to practice, perhaps even a month, but “ WOW”, that will take some beating.
Gives you something to aim for, hey?
Congratulations CHRIS, should buy a lottery ticket while you’re at it.
tmno2
Terry
Edited: 19/08/19 , 17:45 AEST.
Correction to above, “Chris” is mentioned in GAPS “year” scores on January 11th, with a time of 1:27.7, so he did have some reasonable playing experience under his belt, when achieving the outstanding score identified above.
So practice plus luck has won out, leading to support my opinion that a “hack” is a most unlikely way to achieve glory in this game.
tmno2
Terry